Shaq’s simple questions about where you want to go and what you want to do have led me to a short list of places and things. They seem fairly simple and straight-forward. But none of them are easy to achieve. That is fine. I don’t retreat from a challenge. I have a lot of accomplishments to list. But it does make me take a step back to reflect a bit.
In our culture, we are constantly trying to achieve things. We have to prove that we’re worthy. Shaq talked about how his step-dad never showed appreciation for his accomplishments. He didn’t display his childhood trophies. When he won NBA championships, his step-dad was unimpressed and pressed him to go win another. Shaq didn’t tell these stories out of spite or pain. He adored his step-dad and said he wanted to raise his own kids like he was raised. His step-dad took this approach to push him to constantly be better and achieve more and more.
Reba McEntire has also appeared on Oprah’s Master Class, and I listened to hear interview recently. Though she couldn’t be more different from Shaq in every way, she described a similar mindset. She talked about having different goals–hit records, touring, financial security, a TV series, Broadway, etc. And as she achieved these different goals, she wanted new goals to achieve. She was always looking for new challenges to conquer.
At one point, Reba talked about a particular hit song she had recorded, “Is There Life Out There?” I like a bit of the older country music. When Dolly sang about her coat of many colors, Loretta sang about getting the pill or Tammy Wynette sang about sheltering young kids from the horrors of a failed marriage, those songs meant something. But by the late 70s, the point of country music had faded, in my opinion, and it wasn’t my cup of tea. I’m not a fan of Reba’s, though I did once see her live in concert because a friend gave me a free ticket. I had never heard of “Is There Life Out There?” But it sounded compelling.
Reba described how that particular song seemed to be a rallying cry to her female listeners who had spent the first phase of their adult lives raising kids, then had to figure out how to live the rest of their lives. The woman in the song had married young and hadn’t lived for herself. After her kids were grown, she didn’t know what to do next. She thought about leaving her husband and wondered what else life might have in store for her. Whether or not we became mothers at a young age and whether or not we contemplate leaving our partners, I think a lot of women–who have devoted a significant amount of our waking hours to raising their kids–can relate to themes like that. Reba said that when she sang the song in concert, women would hold up their GEDs and diplomas to show that they had taken the song to heart and gone on to accomplish more.
I think that is great. And I always support people getting an education. But on one level, these attitudes bother me. It is one thing for a woman to go back to school to get educational credentials to enable her to provide for her family or to give herself financial independence. Who could argue with that? Not I.
But sometimes that is not what education or career accomplishments are about. Sometimes it is about achieving more and more. But to what end? Shaq already had achieved more than most mere mortals, let alone most professional athletes, but his step-dad kept pushing him to achieve more. None of his achievements were enough. He had to do more. When he had climbed to the top of the mountain, he was pushed to climb the same darn mountain again and again. Similarly, with Reba, she had conquered pretty much every entertainment modality, but ended her interview saying that she never wanted to stop being challenged and conquering.
To what end is all this achievement? That is a funny question to come from me. When I was a practicing attorney, my employer sent me to a week long management training seminar at a prestigious university’s business college. We learned a lot about leadership, management, vision, goals and a host of other topics. One session was about Type A and Type B personalities. The former is characterized by high productivity, being goals oriented and frankly neurotic. The latter personality type is essentially much more chill. When we took the test, I was pretty proud of myself initially. Most of the people in the room were Type B, so I was feeling pretty superior. I was the personality type that got things done! But then the professor elaborated on the differences a bit more. He explained that both personality types were common among successful people.  Indeed, the people in the seminar that week were considered the best in their respective departments. And they came from a variety of disciplines–engineers, geophysicists, accountants, marketing professionals and chemists. These were not a bunch of slackers, though most were Type B. The professor then tried to gently share the biggest difference between the two personality types: life expectancy. In essence, the Type A folks died prematurely from stress. I wasn’t feeling so superior at that point.
Due to a variety of factors, most of my friends tend to be highly educated people. Highly educated people tend to beget highly educated children. Even my friends who live in poverty tend to have at least one college degree under their belt, sometimes more. And I have come to realize that that comes at a cost. Kids who are labeled as “gifted” or funneled into honors courses are more likely to end up with stress related health problems like anxiety or depression.
I myself was always just on the cusp in grade school, but never quite measured up to the “gifted” level. So, I ended up avoiding that kind of pressure until law school. At that point, I was frankly just glad to have a seat at the table and didn’t want to be sent home. So when I ended up in the top 10% of my class after the first semester exams, I was shocked and frankly petrified. The pressure led to chronic back pain that required hours in the chiropractor’s office every week for months. I had to drop a class and almost had to leave school. I made it through, but the stress became a way of life.
It is not fun. I’ve known folks who had that pressure from much earlier ages and the stress related health problems have followed them into adulthood. I know families whose kids are already having such issues. IBS, insomnia, panic attacks, emotional meltdowns. That is a lot to lay on a young person. And to what end? Many of these kids I know are going to end up at the same universities and professions as the kids who weren’t in a cajillion honors classes and doing homework every waking moment. Most of them aren’t going to Ivy Leagues or aiming for Wall Street. So why all the intensity?
With my own kids, I want them to do well, but honors classes aren’t what I would necessarily want for them. I’d like them to explore and take different classes to broaden their horizons. And to have some fun. But some of the more elite schools take away meaningful choice. Everyone has to take foreign language and fine arts, so there isn’t a lot of opportunity to spread one’s wings.
But to say these things aloud is a type of social taboo. I get stressed out talking to parents of my kids’ peers. Johnny is taking this or doing that. Sally just got chosen for this special program or award. I feel like I have to show how my kids are keeping up. It is nuts. They are just kids. They aren’t prize ponies.
Then I think about the parents who don’t stress me out. Their kids are having serious issues. The specific issues vary. It might be that their grades are sub-par. Maybe they are in special ed. They might not graduate. Even if they do, it is not clear what they’d do afterwards. Many of them have health problems. It is night and day from the experiences of the high achieving kids. And I’m not stressed out around their parents because I don’t feel I’m constantly have to prove my kids are keeping up.
I’ve reflected at times, where are the “average” kids? I’m not sure if our society doesn’t have such kids any more. Alternately, maybe it is just my social circle. But if our society puts pressure even on kids to “achieve,” what does that say about the ones who have issues and are lucky to just get through? I think the uncomfortable answer is that our society says those kids are losers. That sounds pretty harsh, but I think that is what we are collectively saying. That is the result of tying achievement to worth. We don’t seem to see value in just being a human. Even a kind, loving one.
And obviously it is not just how we judge kids.  We judge adults by what they do for a living. It is often the first thing we ask when we meet someone. I began my career as an idealistic inner city teacher, so when I got that question, the response I got was typically unimpressed. Depending on the setting where it was asked, I could feel people looking past me, bored and trying to find a way to move on to someone more interesting. Later when I was a lawyer or a law professor, I got a very different response. Eyebrows would go up. Eyes widened. The word “wow!” was often used. My intellect and soul hadn’t changed at all. But because my profession had, it was clear that my social value had in many people’s eyes.
I listen to NPR a lot in the car. Weekdays the programming is great, but on weekends, it is not as strong in my opinion. NPR is often derided by critics as a bastion of liberal intellectuals. At no time is that stereotype more definitively confirmed than on the comedic shows like “Wait, Wait…Don’t Tell Me!” When a listener calls in to play a game, the first question the host asks is, “What do you do for a living?” That seems like a rather rude, blunt question. So sometimes Peter Sagal couches it in softer terms, “What do you do in Omaha?” Alternately, I’ve heard a vaguer variant, “What do you do?” But no matter how Mr. Sagal phrases the question, the point is clear. He is asking what the listener does professionally, he is not asking about hobbies or family. NPR listeners want to know what the person’s profession is. And frequently, Mr. Sagal then makes a little joke out of whatever the answer is. I’ve listened to NPR for years and I don’t think I’ve ever heard a listener call in and answer that they are a plumber, police officer or auto mechanic. Maybe that is a reflection of who listens to NPR. But it may also be a reflection of who feels comfortable calling in to NPR to have to answer that question. There is absolutely nothing wrong with plumbers, police officers or auto mechanics. They all fill important roles in our society. And we couldn’t get along without them. But they aren’t the sorts of professions that inspires people in our society to say “wow!” That is telling. And unflattering in what it says about our societal values.
Another thing that is telling and unflattering is that unpaid family work is not worthy of a “wow!” response in our society. Heck, for many (most?) in our society, it is not even considered to be work. Caring for one’s family is viewed akin to a quaint hobby. Not something that should take up many hours in the day of an intelligent person. Such people are too good for that and should be doing so much more. I am not saying I condone this in the least. Just observing it is the case. On occasion, I hear stay-at-home parents call in to NPR programs. They often feel the need to augment their responses by adding that they used to be speech therapists, do lots of volunteer work or run a small home business on the side. Being a full-time caregiver is not “enough” to justify their existence, especially not if they aren’t even being paid. Payment is a proxy for worth in our society.
I know something first hand about this attitude towards unpaid family work. When my husband and I had two small children and two high pressure corporate jobs, something had to give. So, we decided to become a one career family, and at the time, it made most sense for him to step away from his career. I was quite proud of this. He had a great career and terrific prospects. He sacrificed it to put his family first and to be a feminist trail-blazer. But I was shocked and dismayed how society viewed all this in less favorable terms. Quite frankly, most people seemed to think he was a loser who couldn’t hold down a job. He tried to volunteer (at my prompting) for our church’s finance committee because he was a CPA with over a decade of complex corporate accounting and they had a group of amateurs with less qualifications running things. They had actually made quite a mess of things and he could have fixed things up in short order. However, they rejected his offer because they just assumed that as a person without a paying gig, he had nothing to offer. That sort of thing happened a lot. And years later, when we switched roles, I got a lot of the same reactions. People couldn’t believe I would “just” be staying home with my kids. They couldn’t understand why I wouldn’t miss my career. But a career isn’t everything. Relationships are important. Getting off the treadmill and having time to enjoy life…or just reflect has been lovely.
As my kids are getting older though and need me less frequently, however, I too am at a crossroads like the woman in Reba’s song. But I don’t need any more degrees and have already had an interesting career. I considered getting a Ph.D. That could be interesting. But what would be the point? And at this phase of my life, is that really what I want to do with the time I have left on this planet? I don’t think so. Moreover, my husband’s job pays the bills. We were both raised in fairly humble circumstances and as adults, we don’t like to live extravagantly. So, I also don’t feel the need to take on paid employment.  I do have some things I’d like to achieve.  But at this phase of life, I’d like to enjoy simple things too. I am not like Shaq and Reba, who apparently have a never-ending list of mountains to climb. I would like to climb a couple mountains, but not just to have something to check off my list. I’d like to enjoy the journey and take pit-stops to notice where I am and what I’m doing. Being present and enjoying life is something that Americans don’t often do.
